Changing North
Korea’s Strategies, Policies and
Their Perspective
by
Shigeru AOYAMA
Senior
Member of Research Committee, DRC
Introduction
More than a half century has passed since the end of the World WarU, however the Korean Peninsula still remains as
the most unstable region in the world along with the Mid-East. In spite of any
effort for reconciliation and stability of the peninsula by both nations and
surrounding nations concerned such as the United States and Japan, successful
solution or its clear indication is not yet in sight.
As the end of the Cold War, coping with increasing regional armed
conflicts caused by race or religion and proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction, establishment of new international order became a matter of great
urgency. On September eleventh 2001, large scale transnational terrorism hit the United States with commercial air planes which caused thousands of indiscriminate
victims. This unpredictable, or
beyond the estimated scale of, catastrophe that caused the President Bush to
announce “this is a war”, gave great shock to many people in the world as well
as American citizens. After
the incident, most of the nations in the world transcended their own races,
religions and even the confrontation between nations in the past to band
against the terrorism by manifesting the support to or cooperating with the U.S. in
the operations to exclude and eradicate terrorists.
I had never heard of so many nations and people sharing a common
realization to an incident and holding international solidarity and cooperation
with each other. This fact will
remain in the history of international security as a new type of thereat that
merged at the beginning of 21st century.
One of major reasons that the U.S. led military operations in
Afghanistan against terrorists so rapidly and with some success in spite of
geographically, meteorologically and operationally hard conditions, would be
that the U.S. could have strong support and cooperation by many nations such as
European countries, nations of republics of former Soviet Union including
Russia and Asian countries. The
fact showed that even for the United States, which has the most modernized and powerful military forces in the
world, international cooperation by many nations and support of global public
opinions would be required to cope with such an asymmetric threat. Wherever these asymmetric threats may
actually appear in future, international cooperation and solidarity will be
necessary to cope rapidly and effectively with them.
On the Korean Peninsula, as two years have past since the North and South Summit Talks in Pyongyang June 13th 2000, it seems that reconciliation between North and South may not
progress yet: Kim Jong Il
has not visit Seoul yet. Although it is not
easy to guess exactly inside the Kim regime and the actual military postures of
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) including development of nuclear weapons and missiles, there seems
to be some indication of changes that North Korea might be going to participate in the international society.
Under such international situations, Prime Minister Koizumi
announced that he would visit Pyongyang and have summit talks with Kim Jong Il September 17 this year. He said that he thought this was only
way to approach towards solutions of various pending problems. He could have thought that a good time
has come to have summit talks, realizing some indication of North Korea’s change. The summit
talks with Kim Jong Il are,
I think, appropriate choice to negotiate with such a despotic state where Kim’s
order is required to move military troop more than a battalion for exercise,
where a normal process for negotiations held and worked by diplomat’s levels
before getting political decision by a minister may not be adaptable. So it is usually difficult to measure
the concrete results and to establish medium-or long-term strategy to negotiate
with North Korea in advance; flexibility and toughness are rather required for
negotiation. When we deliberate
reconciliation and stability on the Korean Peninsula, we have to recognize
relations comprehensively not only between North and South Korea (Republic of
Korea) but those of surrounding nations such as the United States, Japan,
Russian Federation (Russia) and China that have been historically involved with
both nations.
I would like to examine focusing on the North Korea’s changing trend under the international security situation in
these days.
1. Indications of Political Changes in North
Korea
(1) Foreign Policies
The critical issues of North Korea now with which international society is heavily concerned would be
moratorium of nuclear development, with the project fund for light water
reactor by the KEDO for collateral alternative energy supply, and the restraint
of ballistic missile development and export. But North Korea seems to be facing chronic and urgent economical difficulties
especially the shortage of energy and food.
Kim Jong Il seems
to want to expand diplomatic and economic relations aggressively with many nations
and international organizations to improve such internally difficult
situation. In recent years, North Korea has been advancing diplomatic activities including establishment
and restoration of relations with the European and Asian countries and European
Union (EU), as well as enhancing ties with China and
Russia.
a. Establishment and Restoration of Diplomatic Relations
North Korea has established and restored diplomatic relations with thirteen
nations in recent year. These are
as follows:
@ Italy (Jan. 4, ’00), A Australia (May 8, ’00; restored after 25 years’ break off),
B Philippines (July 12, ’00), C United Kingdom (Dec. 12, ’00), D Netherlands
(Jan. 15, ’01), E Belgium (Jan. 23, ’01), F Canada (Feb. 6, ’01), G Spain (Feb. 7, ’01), H Germany (Mar. 1, ’01), I Luxemburg
(Mar. 5, ’01), J Greece (Mar. 8, ’01), K Brazil (Mar. 9, ’01), L Kuwait (Apr. 4, ’01)
[figures in brackets show dates of establishment or restoration]
b. Diplomatic Relations with International
Organizations
North Korea has become a United Nations (UN) member on September 17th 1991 simultaneously with South Korea, but has contributed to it very little both in personnel and
funds. [Reference: rate of
contribution for 2002 regular budget is 0.009%, in comparison to 1.866% of South Korea and 19.669% of Japan.]
But North
Korea established
diplomatic relations with EU in May 14th 2001, just after a
delegation of EU visited Pyongyang as a board member of KEDO.
Further more, North
Korea was approved
the membership in ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) in May 2000, and participated in
ARF in Bangkok, Thailand in July 2000. During
ARF in Brunei in July 2002, North Korean Foreign Minister Pak carried out
bilateral diplomatic talks actively with many foreign ministers such as the U.S., Japan, China, Australia,
and Brunei. Especially, the talks
between Japanese Foreign Minister Kawaguchi and Pak which were held after an
interval of two years are held to have were
accelerated Koizumi's visit to Pyongyang.
c. Relationship with Russia
and China
During the Cold War, Korean Peninsula lied
in the thick of the East-West confrontation, and as the result of the Korean
War, confrontation of North-South Korea on the Peninsula was quite symbolic as the front of the Cold War. North Korea had stood on the former Soviet
Union (Russian) side, and also had been
keeping close relations with China
that sent volunteer soldiers’ forces to North Korea during the Korean War.
As the East-West
confrontational structure disappeared at the end of the Cold War, effort of
support and cooperation to North Korea by both nations declined, because they had to reconstruct their own
domestic system and structure such as politics, economy and society. Since China has
established diplomatic relations with South Korea in 1992 to vitalize the economical exchanges, it became unfavorable
for China to have that intensified North-South tension over the Korean Peninsula.
Russia,
as the leader of the CIS, and domestically having been kept busy by the
struggle for independence of Republic of Chechen, has been endeavoring to reorganize the political and social system
and rehabilitating national economy.
NATO that had been the biggest military threat during the Cold War
to the Soviet Union and other Warsaw Pact (WP) nations, has transferred its
objective from defending against military aggression by WP forces to the
Western Europe to the maintenance of peace and stability in the whole European
region in a complementing role to the EU.
For that purpose, NATO tried to expand its territory eastward including
former WP nations, and in January 1994 NATO proposed “Partnership For Peace (PFP)” whose concept is to promote mild military
and political ties among European nations including Russia. Twenty five nations including former WP
signatories such as Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic joined to PFP soon, and
Russia also did so half a year later, and the international relationship in
Europe was improved to promote to coping with the post Cold War situations.
Another friction which lied between the United States and Russia was
the issue of “Ballistic
Missile Defense” initiative and
withdrawal from ABM Treaty by the U.S. But some progress of START talks between the U.S. and Russia
was seen since Mr. Putin took position of the
President in February 2000, and at the same time, he allowed the U.S. to
develop missile defense system and to withdraw from ABM Treaty.
The relationship between the U.S. and Russia
was rapidly promoted when Russia
expressed to support the U.S.
decision and to cooperate with the U.S.
anti-terrorism actions immediately after occurrence of “the September 11
Terrorism”. Then in 2002, the U.S.
urged Russia to affiliate with the World Summit as an official member state;
this also is seen to have strengthened friendship and solidarity between both
nations.
Recent noticeable actions by Russia
and China with North
Korea are as
follows.
(a) Russia
“The Good Neighbor, Friendship and Cooperation
Treaty” between Russia and North Korea was signed in February 2000 in
Pyongyang. The Treaty replaced “The
Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance Treaty” invalidated in 1996, and
new relationship between Russia
and North Korea was confirmed by this Treaty.
Although the new treaty seemed that automatic intervention by Russian
military forces to North Korea in the case of emergency is not provided, it was
clear that the political (diplomatic) and economical relations of both nations
are sure to be consolidated.
Kim Jong Il took
long tours to Russia by railroad in both 2001 and 2002, and had summit talks with
President Putin, confirming close relations and
economic cooperation. At the latest
summit talks, they talked about the connection of railroad running through the Korean Peninsula and
Siberia Railroad across the border of both countries.
(b) China
In January 2001, Kim Jong Il visited factories for products of advanced technologies
such as semi-conductors in Shanghai. President Kim Dae Jun, of South Korea said that “Kim Jong Il’s visit to Shanghai indicates
that North Korea has great concern with Chinese reforms and openness, and is aimed
sure to follow the way of China. It shows the clear evidence that North Korea is going to change.” Kim’s inspection of Sinuiju (close to Chinese border), just after his coming
back from China, seemed some probability to establish “Sinuiju-Dandong Economic Special Ward” in cooperation with China.
Chinese President Jiang Zemin also visited North Korea in September 2001 after an interval of eleven years, showing close
relations with each other.
(2) Domestic Policies
The most significant changes in North Korea are along its economic policies. Increasing refugees from North Korea
show that its economic difficulty including shortage of food must be in serious
condition. “The Economic Reform” which started in July 2002 is composed of
drastic policies ever had in North Korea and it can not possibly be turned back
again. I would like to overview
these changing domestic policies.
a. Concept of Reform
North Korea announced the concept of reform as a statement of Kim Jong Il on “The Labor News Paper” January 4, 2001, bulletin of the Korean Labor Party. He stated that 21st Century is a century
of enormous change and creation!
His other remarks are as follows:
@ People shouldn’t work like in
old ways. Do the job in coping with
the requirements of new era.
A In order to unify our
mother land by constructing a great nation within the 2000s, military forces
and people must be faithful to the guidance of the Party.
B People should adhere
to the Revolutionary Red Flag with solidarity, to carry out the great
achievements in the 2000s as a great nation, to gain a victory at the great
tasks of socialism.
C People should wholly
review old foreign systems and customs, and develop all businesses in Korean
systems.
D People must start new
reform and revolution in agriculture.
E In order to promote
and develop our economy in coping with today’s requirements that are continuously advancing, people must install
and equip factories with the newest facilities and technologies.
F Without persistence
to old preconceived ideas in the past age, people should boldly abandon what is
unnecessary to rebuild the technology.
G Today is an era of
science and technology that are growing in high speed. If we stay on the spot with
satisfaction, we can neither overcome the difficulty nor promote our national
economy. We should resolve all
problems with new point of view.
b. Economic Reform
For the reconstruction of economy, the biggest domestic problem, the
economic reform which was started in July 2002 is a utilitarian policy to
pursue the reform of the economic system and enterprises. Concrete focuses of the reform are: @reform of enterprises, such as the evaluation
of business performance, expanding authorities of factory managers,
introduction of self-supporting system, Asubstantial abolition of rationing systems except rice distribution,
Bincrease of allowance
(approximate average is 20 times for workers in factory), Cprice increase (examples; rice 1kg = 0.08→44won, subway fare = 0.1→2won, beer = 8→600won), Ddevaluation of currency (1dollar = approx. 2.15 → 150won).
This reform seemed to start with introduction of basic elements of market
economy systems, such as self-supporting system and trade by corporations,
authorized by amendment of the Constitution in September 1998. Mr. Kim, Undersecretary of Trade
Minister of North Korea, visiting Japan this September, said that, although they
prepared to introduce economic reform for more than two years, it was not
complete but had some contradictions; they figured price system according to
the relations between supply and demand, while retaining the authorization of
government’s control to some extent; and that they wanted to study Japanese
model in future.
c. Other Changes
(a) Increase of Refugees
Reflecting recent economic difficulty, shortage of foods and other
reasons, numbers of refugees
from North Korea are increasing.
These incidents caused the diplomatic problems involving China, South Korea and other diplomatic establishments in China. According to the data announced by
Korean Intelligence House, numbers of refugees from North Korea for a year were 148 persons in 1999, 312 in 2000, 583 in 2001 and
838 by the end of September in 2002.
Government of North
Korea must be
required to take drastic measures in response.
(b) Promotion of Science and Technology
(Information Technology)
Promotion of science and technology which Kim Jong
Il showed in “The Perspective of 21st Century” is
especially focusing on information technology (IT). He visited China and
with much interest inspected IT factories in Shanghai by
himself. As other activities, some
computer company of North
Korea developed
software jointly with a private company of South Korea, and also North
Korea held “The
First Exhibition for Computer Software” in Beijing April 2002.
(c) Military Trend
Just after the North-South Summit Talks in Pyongyang in June
2000, thawed mood spread over the Korean Peninsula for
a while and expectation for harmony between North and South Korea rose among the South Korean people. But on the other hand, military
situation around DMZ was never eased.
Defense expenditure of North Korea in 2002 is estimated to be approximately 3.2 billion won which is
about average amount of a normal year and accounts for 14.4% of total
expenditures.
Military troops that marched in Pyongyang on “the
70th Annual Commemorative Ceremony for Establishment of Korean People’s Army” is not composed of regular soldiers but of militia members
without heavy weapons and missile.
(d) Correspondence to Media
The government of North Korea has been regulating and restricting
inflow of information from outside to the people, and on the other hand, has
been making use of information to outside as important measures to pursue
diplomatic strategies or propaganda by controlling and managing it. But, I think, it is getting difficult to
regulate and control information which flows in and out of the country in
global and borderless information age.
According to the report by journalists who accompanied the EU
delegations for KEDO to North Korea in 2001, North Korean government allowed 75
journalists to enter the North Korea and treated them more flexibly and freely
than before; for example, they were permitted to walk around their hotel alone
without guides/watchers and to go around downtown in nighttime with
guides. The facts might indicate
Kim’s intention to loosen regulation of information to some extent in order to
contact more with international society.
2. Exchange between South and North
Korea
It has been two years since South Korean President Kim Dae Jung visited Pyongyang and had
historical Summit Talks with Kim Jong Il in June 2000. “The Joint Declaration” which was issued
just after the summit talks said that Kim Jong Il would visit Seoul at appropriate time.
But it is not carried out yet.
North Korean military postures including scales of deployment forces
around South-North border and expenditures for military budget are surely not
eased, as well as any vision or process to reunification is not figured out
yet; nevertheless, @ human right
issues such as exchange of dispersed families (Article 3), A economic, social, cultural and other
cooperation and exchanges (Article 4), B dialogues for realization of agreements on the Declaration (Article
5) are partially in action. For
example, tourists business of Kaesong and Kumgangsan designating as special free wards, and
connection and construction of Kyong-Ui Line railroad
across the border, have been agreed on.
In April this year, South Korean Special Envoy of the President
visited Pyongyang and agreed with North Korean government on various issues
such as detente and reunification of the Korean Peninsula, connection business
of road and railroad through the South-North Korea, tourists business of Kumgangsan, and other issues to cooperate with each other,
including the first joint marching at the Sydney Olympic Opening (Sept. 15,
’00) and the planned joint marching at the Pusan
Asian Games (Oct. 4, ’02) under the Unification Flag. The results of the meeting in Pyongyang led to
agreements of ten items by “Conference of Minister level” held in Seoul this August,
and further more, the agreements were succeeded to the “2nd Conference for
Promotion of South-North Economic Cooperation”.
Some say that such progress of exchanges between South and North
might be along one-sided strategy by Kim Jong Il and “Sunshine Policy” by Kim Dae
Jung must be exploited only by the North.
But it may be desirable, I think, for reconciliation between the South
and North and peace for the peninsula, in the medium- or long-term, to
strengthen the North Korean dependency toward the South.
3. The U.S.
Policies over the Korean
Peninsula
The diplomatic posture of the U.S. President George Bush is now
basically to promote dialogues with North Korea asking moratorium of nuclear development, prohibition of missile
development and export and reduction of the conventional forces around the DMZ,
in exchange for providing conditional assistance for Light Water Reactor and
fuel oil and other economic support.
But the postures of President Bush toward North Korea is different from
those of former President Clinton, who regarded dialogues with North Korea as the most important.
Bush proceeds with the negotiation, retaining the attitude to employ
military forces if necessary.
“The Quadrennial Defense
Review (2001)” and “Annual Defense Report (2002)” by the Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld clearly shows that the United States will keep
watching over and prepare with top priority against development and use of
weapons of mass destruction and terrorism, and fight decisively without any
compromise until their roots are eradicated, with preemptive attack if
necessary.
For that goal, the U.S.
defense budget for FY2003 was assessed at the highest amount since the end of
the Cold War era; it was an increase of 15 percent over previous year. President Bush proposed to create “The
Department of Homeland Security” and its strategy in 2002. The new Department aims to improve
protection against today’s threats and to be flexible enough to help meet the
unknown threats of the future. This
transformation is the most significant in the U.S. government
in over a half-century by largely transforming and realigning the current
confusing patchwork of government activities into a single department whose
primary mission is to protect American homeland. The Department would unify authority
over major federal security operations related to the borders, territorial
waters, and transportation systems.
The basic security strategy of Bush administration, I think, is that
security for the nation and American people precedes preservation of freedom
and democracy, so firstly securing the homeland security as well as defending
national interest, then the U.S.
pursues accomplishment of the responsibility to maintain the world order and
peace.
4. North Korea’s Strategy and Its
Perspective in Future
It is generally difficult to predict the future of a despotic state
like North Korea exactly, in which information is strictly controlled, but as I
pointed out before, there seem some different tendencies from before in both
domestic and diplomatic policies and activities. Kim Jong Il
and government people might have recognized that in order to recover and
improve their chronic economic distress and shortage of foods, acquirement of
funds and supplies only is not effective measure to remove such hard situation,
but rather reformation or building up of national infrastructures such as
energy, transportation, science and technology for industries and economic and
social systems are required.
What Kim Jong Il persists as his basic philosophies at present may be, I think, as
follows:
@ to continue to be
despotic ruler as a basis for reunification
A to reform national
economic system, introducing market economy system and technological
innovation, and modernization of agriculture
B to reduce or avoid the
U.S. military threat
C to predominate over or
to be on a equal footing with the South Korea for reconciliation and
reunification
In order to carry out the economic reformation to which he might be
going to devote himself, financial support and technical cooperation by
advanced nations are essential.
Support and cooperation by China and
Russia would be expected to some extent, and also EU and its membership
nations might provide certain support to North Korea.
North Korea doesn’t have diplomatic relations with the U.S. and Japan,
the world leaders both in economic and technological fields. As the tough talking is now underway
with Japan, if she could gain these support after normalization of diplomatic
relations with both nations, it would be the most desirable to achieve his
objectives. But under the current
security situations, North
Korea may seriously
want to reduce or avoid the strongest military threats of the United States, rather than playing maneuver.
In that sense, recent North Korea’s expansion and enhancement of diplomatic relations with China, Russia
and other European advanced nations must be not only to gain necessary support
or assistance from them, but also to contain or loosen the U.S.
military threats. North Korea is also required to reduce her military expenditure and to avoid
armed conflict against South
Korea in order to
get out of urgent economic difficulties.
We should keep watching military trends and postures of North Korea.
Another issue that North Korea must face in the process of economic reform is to control and
manage information coming in and out of the country. As the relationship with other nations
and international communities is getting closer, the flows of related
information would increase and be much wider, so it may be hard to control or
restrict information so as not to reach people directly.
Conclusion
“The End of the Cold War” with collapse of the
Berlin Wall in 1990, “the Gulf War” caused by Iraq’s invasion to Kuwait in
1991, and “September 11 Terrorism” to the United States in 2001; who could
predict occurrences of these facts in advance? This tells how it is difficult to
predict or forecast security situations and appearance of threats in future.
World peace and prosperity is common desire of human being
regardless of nationality, race and religion; however all human being cannot
escape from these actual situations to cope with and challenge them.
International security is to prepare for the worst thinkable
situations, and strong solidarity among international societies is necessarily
required.
[September 10, 2002]
○
Biographies of authors
○
Contents